John Y. Lee, James Madison University, USA.
E-mail: lee2jy@jmu.edu

Read full paper in PDF-format

Abstract

Bearing (Perspectival) Witness:
Absolutist Commitment Amid Religious Pluralism

In our postmodern context, there has been much talk and concern about religious pluralism.  That there is a greater awareness of religious plurality in our cities and nations no one can doubt.  Yet, questionable conclusions are being drawn from the facticity of religious plurality: for example, that we ought to see the various religious traditions as equally “true,” that the various religious traditions are only phenomenological manifestations of an Ultimate Reality (so they are ontologically on equal footing), and that no one tradition is superior than the others because all are humanly conceived and perspectival, no one tradition providing a God’s-eye view of reality.  Other conclusions are drawn as well that touch upon epistemic commitment: that we should cease the claiming of truth in an exclusivist mode, that our hold on truth is fallible and radically open-ended, that absolutist commitment to one’s tradition is potentially harmful, helping to fuel intolerance and the religious violence that we see in the world.

In this paper I attempt to sort out the conflations and confusions involved in our thinking about religious pluralism and argue for the position that absolutist commitment is compatible with religious plurality.  I argue that an absolutist commitment need not eventuate in the kinds of harmful mindsets and attitudes which are sometimes associated with intolerance and violence.  Rather, I show that a biblically informed absolutist commitment is embedded in profound humility and gratitude, and is compatible with respect for others and enjoined to a call for peaceful living amid plurality of all sorts.


Back to "Tabled Papers"